Beta Readers are a wonderful and free source of feedback for writers. They are not, however, the final word on your work.
Don’t forget that the tension between a reader and a writer is actually a good thing – most literary people read to consider another view, to be stretched – not to only be placated with mutual beliefs. Writers are often forced to risk disagreement and quietly stand their ground.
Beta Readers might justify their literary preferences.
If your reader only reads fiction, they are not the best choice for feedback on a nonfiction book. A biased reader may experience the unfamiliar landscape with a narrow scope. If they tend to avoid specific forms, for example, a complex preface, they might show intolerance for yours. This is not necessarily true for other well-rounded readers.
Beta Readers will mirror their own perceptions of your subject matter.
Let’s say your reader holds strong views that we must all find success on our own, and we should not expect any handouts. But your book celebrates philanthropy, thus promoting the welfare of others. Your reader might balk at your views. This contention could leave your reader feeling annoyed, or even guilty. As a result, the reader’s feedback suggests that the book is “a bit preachy.” Consider the source when a reader implies their own discomfort. There is no need to jump to defense, nor to necessarily make any changes.
On the other hand, Beta Readers could grant sensible change.
When a reader’s advice feels intuitively correct to you, it is valuable feedback. If you have had a nagging feeling about some aspect of your content, a beta reader can help nudge you to go back and address it.
Always thank your readers for their feedback, whether you fully agree or not. They are either going to help you revise and grow, or they will help you further define and stand behind your intent.
